Mongolia vs Zambia: Logistics performance index: Quality of trade and transport-related

Mongolia
2.3 1=low to 5=high
in 2022
Zambia
2.3 1=low to 5=high
in 2018
Mongolia rank
112th
Zambia rank
112th

Logistics performance index: Quality of trade and transport-related over time

  • Mongolia
  • Zambia
00.511.522.5200720142022

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 2.3 1=low to 5=high against 2.3 1=low to 5=high in Zambia, a difference of 0 1=low to 5=high.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Zambia ahead.

Mongolia ranks 112th and Zambia ranks 112th of 156 countries.

Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mongolia Zambia Difference Ahead
2000s 1.92 1=low to 5=high 2 1=low to 5=high 0.08 1=low to 5=high Zambia
2010s 2.09 1=low to 5=high 2.18 1=low to 5=high 0.0813 1=low to 5=high Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher logistics performance index: quality of trade and transport-related, Mongolia or Zambia?
Mongolia, at 2.3 1=low to 5=high against 2.3 1=low to 5=high in Zambia as of 2022.
What is the difference in logistics performance index: quality of trade and transport-related between Mongolia and Zambia?
0 1=low to 5=high, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Zambia?
5 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
How do Mongolia and Zambia rank globally for logistics performance index: quality of trade and transport-related?
Mongolia ranks 112th and Zambia ranks 112th of 156 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB), published as Logistics performance index: Quality of trade and transport-related infrastructure (1=low to 5=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mongolia vs Zambia: Logistics performance index: Quality of trade and transport-related. Statizoid, drawing on Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/logistics-performance-index-quality-of-trade-and-transport-related-infrastructure-1-low/mongolia/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/logistics-performance-index-quality-of-trade-and-transport-related-infrastructure-1-low/mongolia/zambia/">Mongolia vs Zambia: Logistics performance index: Quality of trade and transport-related</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Logistics performance index: Quality of trade and transport-related infrastructure (1=low to 5=high)
Unit
1=low to 5=high
Source
Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
203 places, 1,362 data points, 2007–2022
Last refreshed

Data are from the Logistics Performance Index survey conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. Respondents evaluate eight countries on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The eight countries are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. The 2023 LPI survey was conducted from September 6 to November 5, 2022. It provided 4,090 country assessments by 652 logistics professionals in 115 countries in all World Bank regions. Details of the survey methodology and index construction methodology are included in Appendix 5 of the 2023 LPI report available at: https://lpi.worldbank.org/report. Respondents evaluated the quality of trade and transport related infrastructure (e.g. ports, railroads, roads, information technology), on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.