Guinea-Bissau vs Nepal: Merchandise exports (current US$), per square kilometre

Guinea-Bissau
8,535 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Nepal
7,987 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau rank
184th
Nepal rank
187th

Merchandise exports (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Nepal
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k12.5k196119922023

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 8,535 current US$ per square kilometre against 7,987 current US$ per square kilometre in Nepal, a difference of 548 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 1.1 times Nepal's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 184th and Nepal ranks 187th of 206 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 2 and Nepal in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Nepal Difference Ahead
1960s 193.61 current US$ per square kilometre 274.28 current US$ per square kilometre 80.67 current US$ per square kilometre Nepal
1970s 241.82 current US$ per square kilometre 528.67 current US$ per square kilometre 286.85 current US$ per square kilometre Nepal
1980s 469.42 current US$ per square kilometre 931.47 current US$ per square kilometre 462.05 current US$ per square kilometre Nepal
1990s 1,010 current US$ per square kilometre 2,649 current US$ per square kilometre 1,639 current US$ per square kilometre Nepal
2000s 2,987 current US$ per square kilometre 5,493 current US$ per square kilometre 2,506 current US$ per square kilometre Nepal
2010s 8,090 current US$ per square kilometre 5,837 current US$ per square kilometre 2,254 current US$ per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2020s 8,882 current US$ per square kilometre 8,687 current US$ per square kilometre 194.8 current US$ per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher merchandise exports (current us$), per square kilometre, Guinea-Bissau or Nepal?
Guinea-Bissau, at 8,535 current US$ per square kilometre against 7,987 current US$ per square kilometre in Nepal as of 2023.
What is the difference in merchandise exports (current us$), per square kilometre between Guinea-Bissau and Nepal?
548 current US$ per square kilometre, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Nepal?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Nepal rank globally for merchandise exports (current us$), per square kilometre?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 184th and Nepal ranks 187th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Merchandise exports (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Nepal: Merchandise exports (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/merchandise-exports-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/merchandise-exports-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/nepal/">Guinea-Bissau vs Nepal: Merchandise exports (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Merchandise exports (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
253 places, 14,096 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Merchandise exports (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.