Kenya vs Tuvalu: Merchandise exports to economies in the Arab World
Kenya
16.2%
in 2023
Tuvalu
15.0%
in 2023
Kenya rank
24th
Tuvalu rank
26th
Merchandise exports to economies in the Arab World over time
- Kenya
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 16.2% against 15.0% in Tuvalu, a difference of 1.2%.
That makes Kenya's figure about 1.1 times Tuvalu's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Kenya ahead.
Kenya ranks 24th and Tuvalu ranks 26th of 205 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kenya averaged higher in 2 and Tuvalu in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 14.3% | 2.2% | 12.0% | Kenya |
| 2010s | 16.9% | 2.6% | 14.3% | Kenya |
| 2020s | 15.1% | 19.7% | 4.7% | Tuvalu |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher merchandise exports to economies in the arab world, Kenya or Tuvalu?
- Kenya, at 16.2% against 15.0% in Tuvalu as of 2023.
- What is the difference in merchandise exports to economies in the arab world between Kenya and Tuvalu?
- 1.2%, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Tuvalu?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
- How do Kenya and Tuvalu rank globally for merchandise exports to economies in the arab world?
- Kenya ranks 24th and Tuvalu ranks 26th of 205 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Merchandise exports to economies in the Arab World (% of total merchandise exports). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Merchandise exports to economies in the Arab World are the sum of merchandise exports by the reporting economy to economies in the Arab World. Data are expressed as a percentage of total merchandise exports by the economy. Data are computed only if at least half of the economies in the partner country group had non-missing data.