Armenia vs Latvia: Merchandise exports to high-income economies
Armenia
86.1%
in 2023
Latvia
85.9%
in 2023
Armenia rank
36th
Latvia rank
37th
Merchandise exports to high-income economies over time
- Armenia
- Latvia
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 86.1% against 85.9% in Latvia, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 36th and Latvia ranks 37th of 206 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 62.3% | 85.5% | 23.3% | Latvia |
| 2000s | 84.1% | 92.1% | 8.0% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 73.6% | 89.1% | 15.5% | Latvia |
| 2020s | 75.5% | 88.0% | 12.6% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher merchandise exports to high-income economies, Armenia or Latvia?
- Armenia, at 86.1% against 85.9% in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in merchandise exports to high-income economies between Armenia and Latvia?
- 0.2%, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Latvia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Armenia and Latvia rank globally for merchandise exports to high-income economies?
- Armenia ranks 36th and Latvia ranks 37th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Merchandise exports to high-income economies (% of total merchandise exports). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Merchandise exports to high-income economies are the sum of merchandise exports from the reporting economy to high-income economies according to the World Bank classification of economies. Data are expressed as a percentage of total merchandise exports by the economy. Data are computed only if at least half of the economies in the partner country group had non-missing data.