Curacao vs High income: Merchandise exports to high-income economies
Merchandise exports to high-income economies over time
- Curacao
- High income
How they compare
Curacao currently reports 94.3% against 71.7% in High income, a difference of 22.6%.
That makes Curacao's figure about 1.3 times High income's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2011 it was High income ahead.
Curacao ranks 7th and High income ranks 8th of 206 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Curacao averaged higher in 1 and High income in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Curacao | High income | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 30.4% | 72.7% | 42.3% | High income |
| 2020s | 90.1% | 72.0% | 18.1% | Curacao |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher merchandise exports to high-income economies, Curacao or High income?
- Curacao, at 94.3% against 71.7% in High income as of 2023.
- What is the difference in merchandise exports to high-income economies between Curacao and High income?
- 22.6%, with Curacao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Curacao and High income?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2023.
- How do Curacao and High income rank globally for merchandise exports to high-income economies?
- Curacao ranks 7th and High income ranks 8th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Merchandise exports to high-income economies (% of total merchandise exports). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Merchandise exports to high-income economies are the sum of merchandise exports from the reporting economy to high-income economies according to the World Bank classification of economies. Data are expressed as a percentage of total merchandise exports by the economy. Data are computed only if at least half of the economies in the partner country group had non-missing data.