IDA total vs Latvia: Merchandise exports to high-income economies
Merchandise exports to high-income economies over time
- IDA total
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 85.9% against 55.9% in IDA total, a difference of 30.0%.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.5 times IDA total's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
IDA total ranks 34th and Latvia ranks 37th of 47 groups.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | IDA total | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 77.2% | 85.5% | 8.3% | Latvia |
| 2000s | 59.8% | 92.1% | 32.3% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 52.6% | 89.1% | 36.5% | Latvia |
| 2020s | 55.7% | 88.0% | 32.3% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher merchandise exports to high-income economies, IDA total or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 85.9% against 55.9% in IDA total as of 2023.
- What is the difference in merchandise exports to high-income economies between IDA total and Latvia?
- 30.0%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IDA total and Latvia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do IDA total and Latvia rank globally for merchandise exports to high-income economies?
- IDA total ranks 34th and Latvia ranks 37th of 47 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Merchandise exports to high-income economies (% of total merchandise exports). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Merchandise exports to high-income economies are the sum of merchandise exports from the reporting economy to high-income economies according to the World Bank classification of economies. Data are expressed as a percentage of total merchandise exports by the economy. Data are computed only if at least half of the economies in the partner country group had non-missing data.