Central Europe and the Baltics vs Guinea-Bissau: Merchandise exports to low- and middle-income economies in East Asia

Central Europe and the Baltics
1.5%
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau
20.4%
in 2023
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
47th
Guinea-Bissau rank
50th

Merchandise exports to low- and middle-income economies in East Asia over time

  • Central Europe and the Baltics
  • Guinea-Bissau
010203040196019912023

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 20.4% against 1.5% in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 18.9%.

That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 13.3 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 43 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Central Europe and the Baltics ahead.

Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 47th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 50th of 47 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, Central Europe and the Baltics averaged higher in 1 and Guinea-Bissau in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Europe and the Baltics Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1970s 4.6% 1.2% 3.5% Central Europe and the Baltics
1980s 4.7% 12.7% 8.0% Guinea-Bissau
1990s 1.7% 4.4% 2.7% Guinea-Bissau
2000s 0.9% 13.2% 12.3% Guinea-Bissau
2010s 1.6% 13.5% 11.8% Guinea-Bissau
2020s 1.7% 18.0% 16.3% Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher merchandise exports to low- and middle-income economies in east asia, Central Europe and the Baltics or Guinea-Bissau?
Guinea-Bissau, at 20.4% against 1.5% in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2023.
What is the difference in merchandise exports to low- and middle-income economies in east asia between Central Europe and the Baltics and Guinea-Bissau?
18.9%, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Guinea-Bissau?
43 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2023.
How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for merchandise exports to low- and middle-income economies in east asia?
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 47th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 50th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Merchandise exports to low- and middle-income economies in East Asia & Pacific (% of total merchandise exports). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Europe and the Baltics vs Guinea-Bissau: Merchandise exports to low- and middle-income economies in East Asia. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/merchandise-exports-to-low-and-middle-income-economies-in-east-asia-and-pacific-percent/central-europe-and-the-baltics/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/merchandise-exports-to-low-and-middle-income-economies-in-east-asia-and-pacific-percent/central-europe-and-the-baltics/guinea-bissau/">Central Europe and the Baltics vs Guinea-Bissau: Merchandise exports to low- and middle-income economies in East Asia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Merchandise exports to low- and middle-income economies in East Asia & Pacific (% of total merchandise exports)
Unit
% of total merchandise exports
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
253 places, 12,319 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Merchandise exports to low- and middle-income economies in East Asia and Pacific are the sum of merchandise exports from the reporting economy to low- and middle-income economies in the East Asia and Pacific region according to World Bank classification of economies. Data are as a percentage of total merchandise exports by the economy. Data are computed only if at least half of the economies in the partner country group had non-missing data.