Chile vs Serbia: Merchandise exports to low- and middle-income economies in
Merchandise exports to low- and middle-income economies in over time
- Chile
- Serbia
How they compare
Chile currently reports 0.5% against 0.5% in Serbia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Chile ranks 139th and Serbia ranks 140th of 204 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.0% | Serbia |
| 2010s | 0.4% | 0.5% | 0.1% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 0.5% | 0.4% | 0.1% | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher merchandise exports to low- and middle-income economies in, Chile or Serbia?
- Chile, at 0.5% against 0.5% in Serbia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in merchandise exports to low- and middle-income economies in between Chile and Serbia?
- 0.0%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Chile and Serbia rank globally for merchandise exports to low- and middle-income economies in?
- Chile ranks 139th and Serbia ranks 140th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Merchandise exports to low- and middle-income economies in Sub-Saharan Africa (% of total merchandise exports). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Merchandise exports to low- and middle-income economies in Sub-Saharan Africa are the sum of merchandise exports from the reporting economy to low- and middle-income economies in the Sub-Saharan Africa region according to World Bank classification of economies. Data are as a percentage of total merchandise exports by the economy. Data are computed only if at least half of the economies in the partner country group had non-missing data.