Brazil vs Sierra Leone: Merchandise imports (current US$), per square kilometre

Brazil
30,235 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sierra Leone
26,628 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
162nd
Sierra Leone rank
164th

Merchandise imports (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Brazil
  • Sierra Leone
010.0k20.0k30.0k196119922023

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 30,235 current US$ per square kilometre against 26,628 current US$ per square kilometre in Sierra Leone, a difference of 3,607 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Brazil's figure about 1.1 times Sierra Leone's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sierra Leone ahead.

Brazil ranks 162nd and Sierra Leone ranks 164th of 205 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 4 and Sierra Leone in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Sierra Leone Difference Ahead
1960s 190.65 current US$ per square kilometre 1,322 current US$ per square kilometre 1,132 current US$ per square kilometre Sierra Leone
1970s 1,291 current US$ per square kilometre 2,548 current US$ per square kilometre 1,256 current US$ per square kilometre Sierra Leone
1980s 2,208 current US$ per square kilometre 2,950 current US$ per square kilometre 741.78 current US$ per square kilometre Sierra Leone
1990s 5,027 current US$ per square kilometre 1,895 current US$ per square kilometre 3,132 current US$ per square kilometre Brazil
2000s 10,842 current US$ per square kilometre 4,734 current US$ per square kilometre 6,108 current US$ per square kilometre Brazil
2010s 24,382 current US$ per square kilometre 19,665 current US$ per square kilometre 4,718 current US$ per square kilometre Brazil
2020s 28,295 current US$ per square kilometre 27,144 current US$ per square kilometre 1,151 current US$ per square kilometre Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher merchandise imports (current us$), per square kilometre, Brazil or Sierra Leone?
Brazil, at 30,235 current US$ per square kilometre against 26,628 current US$ per square kilometre in Sierra Leone as of 2023.
What is the difference in merchandise imports (current us$), per square kilometre between Brazil and Sierra Leone?
3,607 current US$ per square kilometre, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Sierra Leone?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Sierra Leone rank globally for merchandise imports (current us$), per square kilometre?
Brazil ranks 162nd and Sierra Leone ranks 164th of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Merchandise imports (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Sierra Leone: Merchandise imports (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/merchandise-imports-current-us-per-square-kilometre/brazil/sierra-leone/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/merchandise-imports-current-us-per-square-kilometre/brazil/sierra-leone/">Brazil vs Sierra Leone: Merchandise imports (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Merchandise imports (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
252 places, 14,042 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Merchandise imports (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.