Euro area vs Macao: Merchandise imports (current US$), per square kilometre

Euro area
2.07 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Macao
531.58 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Euro area rank
1st
Macao rank
3rd

Merchandise imports (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Euro area
  • Macao
0200.0M400.0M600.0M196119922023

How they compare

Macao currently reports 531.58 million current US$ per square kilometre against 2.07 million current US$ per square kilometre in Euro area, a difference of 529.51 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Macao's figure about 257.0 times Euro area's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Macao has been ahead every year.

Euro area ranks 1st and Macao ranks 3rd of 2 groups.

Macao has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Euro area Macao Difference Ahead
1960s 24,973 current US$ per square kilometre 2.28 million current US$ per square kilometre 2.26 million current US$ per square kilometre Macao
1970s 115,943 current US$ per square kilometre 8.28 million current US$ per square kilometre 8.16 million current US$ per square kilometre Macao
1980s 287,516 current US$ per square kilometre 45.20 million current US$ per square kilometre 44.92 million current US$ per square kilometre Macao
1990s 550,955 current US$ per square kilometre 97.52 million current US$ per square kilometre 96.97 million current US$ per square kilometre Macao
2000s 1.07 million current US$ per square kilometre 153.10 million current US$ per square kilometre 152.02 million current US$ per square kilometre Macao
2010s 1.54 million current US$ per square kilometre 308.83 million current US$ per square kilometre 307.29 million current US$ per square kilometre Macao
2020s 1.92 million current US$ per square kilometre 497.90 million current US$ per square kilometre 495.98 million current US$ per square kilometre Macao

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher merchandise imports (current us$), per square kilometre, Euro area or Macao?
Macao, at 531.58 million current US$ per square kilometre against 2.07 million current US$ per square kilometre in Euro area as of 2023.
What is the difference in merchandise imports (current us$), per square kilometre between Euro area and Macao?
529.51 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Macao ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Euro area and Macao?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Euro area and Macao rank globally for merchandise imports (current us$), per square kilometre?
Euro area ranks 1st and Macao ranks 3rd of 2 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Merchandise imports (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Euro area vs Macao: Merchandise imports (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/merchandise-imports-current-us-per-square-kilometre/euro-area/macao-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/merchandise-imports-current-us-per-square-kilometre/euro-area/macao-sar-china/">Euro area vs Macao: Merchandise imports (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Merchandise imports (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
252 places, 14,042 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Merchandise imports (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.