Macao vs OECD members: Merchandise imports (current US$), per square kilometre

Macao
531.58 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
OECD members
420,277 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Macao rank
3rd
OECD members rank
3rd

Merchandise imports (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Macao
  • OECD members
0200.0M400.0M600.0M196119922023

How they compare

Macao currently reports 531.58 million current US$ per square kilometre against 420,277 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members, a difference of 531.16 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Macao's figure about 1,264.8 times OECD members's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Macao has been ahead every year.

Macao ranks 3rd and OECD members ranks 3rd of 205 countries.

Macao has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Macao OECD members Difference Ahead
1960s 2.28 million current US$ per square kilometre 4,207 current US$ per square kilometre 2.28 million current US$ per square kilometre Macao
1970s 8.28 million current US$ per square kilometre 18,287 current US$ per square kilometre 8.26 million current US$ per square kilometre Macao
1980s 45.20 million current US$ per square kilometre 47,776 current US$ per square kilometre 45.16 million current US$ per square kilometre Macao
1990s 97.52 million current US$ per square kilometre 100,278 current US$ per square kilometre 97.42 million current US$ per square kilometre Macao
2000s 153.10 million current US$ per square kilometre 206,853 current US$ per square kilometre 152.89 million current US$ per square kilometre Macao
2010s 308.83 million current US$ per square kilometre 314,928 current US$ per square kilometre 308.52 million current US$ per square kilometre Macao
2020s 497.90 million current US$ per square kilometre 390,497 current US$ per square kilometre 497.51 million current US$ per square kilometre Macao

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher merchandise imports (current us$), per square kilometre, Macao or OECD members?
Macao, at 531.58 million current US$ per square kilometre against 420,277 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members as of 2023.
What is the difference in merchandise imports (current us$), per square kilometre between Macao and OECD members?
531.16 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Macao ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Macao and OECD members?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Macao and OECD members rank globally for merchandise imports (current us$), per square kilometre?
Macao ranks 3rd and OECD members ranks 3rd of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Merchandise imports (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Macao vs OECD members: Merchandise imports (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/merchandise-imports-current-us-per-square-kilometre/macao-sar-china/oecd-members/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/merchandise-imports-current-us-per-square-kilometre/macao-sar-china/oecd-members/">Macao vs OECD members: Merchandise imports (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Merchandise imports (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
252 places, 14,042 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Merchandise imports (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.