New Caledonia vs Samoa: Merchandise imports (current US$), per square kilometre

New Caledonia
174,781 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Samoa
170,144 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia rank
110th
Samoa rank
112th

Merchandise imports (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • New Caledonia
  • Samoa
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k196119922023

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 174,781 current US$ per square kilometre against 170,144 current US$ per square kilometre in Samoa, a difference of 4,637 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Caledonia ahead.

New Caledonia ranks 110th and Samoa ranks 112th of 205 countries.

New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia Samoa Difference Ahead
1960s 3,793 current US$ per square kilometre 2,984 current US$ per square kilometre 808.95 current US$ per square kilometre New Caledonia
1970s 15,005 current US$ per square kilometre 11,625 current US$ per square kilometre 3,380 current US$ per square kilometre New Caledonia
1980s 25,432 current US$ per square kilometre 20,389 current US$ per square kilometre 5,043 current US$ per square kilometre New Caledonia
1990s 50,399 current US$ per square kilometre 34,452 current US$ per square kilometre 15,947 current US$ per square kilometre New Caledonia
2000s 101,461 current US$ per square kilometre 71,837 current US$ per square kilometre 29,623 current US$ per square kilometre New Caledonia
2010s 164,792 current US$ per square kilometre 127,490 current US$ per square kilometre 37,302 current US$ per square kilometre New Caledonia
2020s 163,539 current US$ per square kilometre 143,705 current US$ per square kilometre 19,834 current US$ per square kilometre New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher merchandise imports (current us$), per square kilometre, New Caledonia or Samoa?
New Caledonia, at 174,781 current US$ per square kilometre against 170,144 current US$ per square kilometre in Samoa as of 2023.
What is the difference in merchandise imports (current us$), per square kilometre between New Caledonia and Samoa?
4,637 current US$ per square kilometre, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Samoa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do New Caledonia and Samoa rank globally for merchandise imports (current us$), per square kilometre?
New Caledonia ranks 110th and Samoa ranks 112th of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Merchandise imports (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs Samoa: Merchandise imports (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/merchandise-imports-current-us-per-square-kilometre/new-caledonia/samoa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/merchandise-imports-current-us-per-square-kilometre/new-caledonia/samoa/">New Caledonia vs Samoa: Merchandise imports (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Merchandise imports (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
252 places, 14,042 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Merchandise imports (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.