Eswatini vs Gambia: Merchandise imports from economies in the Arab World
Eswatini
2.5%
in 2023
Gambia
2.5%
in 2023
Eswatini rank
100th
Gambia rank
102nd
Merchandise imports from economies in the Arab World over time
- Eswatini
- Gambia
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 2.5% against 2.5% in Gambia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Gambia ahead.
Eswatini ranks 100th and Gambia ranks 102nd of 206 countries.
Gambia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Gambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.2% | 3.4% | 3.2% | Gambia |
| 2010s | 0.6% | 4.4% | 3.8% | Gambia |
| 2020s | 2.6% | 6.4% | 3.8% | Gambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher merchandise imports from economies in the arab world, Eswatini or Gambia?
- Eswatini, at 2.5% against 2.5% in Gambia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in merchandise imports from economies in the arab world between Eswatini and Gambia?
- 0.0%, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Gambia?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Gambia rank globally for merchandise imports from economies in the arab world?
- Eswatini ranks 100th and Gambia ranks 102nd of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Merchandise imports from economies in the Arab World (% of total merchandise imports). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Merchandise imports from economies in the Arab World are the sum of merchandise imports by the reporting economy from economies in the Arab World. Data are expressed as a percentage of total merchandise imports by the economy. Data are computed only if at least half of the economies in the partner country group had non-missing data.