Finland vs Montenegro: Merchandise imports from economies in the Arab World
Merchandise imports from economies in the Arab World over time
- Finland
- Montenegro
How they compare
Finland currently reports 0.4% against 0.4% in Montenegro, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Finland's figure about 1.1 times Montenegro's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 148th and Montenegro ranks 151st of 206 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 1 and Montenegro in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.0% | Finland |
| 2010s | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.1% | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.1% | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher merchandise imports from economies in the arab world, Finland or Montenegro?
- Finland, at 0.4% against 0.4% in Montenegro as of 2023.
- What is the difference in merchandise imports from economies in the arab world between Finland and Montenegro?
- 0.0%, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Montenegro?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Finland and Montenegro rank globally for merchandise imports from economies in the arab world?
- Finland ranks 148th and Montenegro ranks 151st of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Merchandise imports from economies in the Arab World (% of total merchandise imports). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Merchandise imports from economies in the Arab World are the sum of merchandise imports by the reporting economy from economies in the Arab World. Data are expressed as a percentage of total merchandise imports by the economy. Data are computed only if at least half of the economies in the partner country group had non-missing data.