Iceland vs Serbia: Merchandise imports from economies in the Arab World
Iceland
3.5%
in 2023
Serbia
3.2%
in 2023
Iceland rank
82nd
Serbia rank
85th
Merchandise imports from economies in the Arab World over time
- Iceland
- Serbia
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 3.5% against 3.2% in Serbia, a difference of 0.3%.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 82nd and Serbia ranks 85th of 206 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.5% | 0.8% | 0.3% | Serbia |
| 2010s | 0.7% | 1.5% | 0.8% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 1.8% | 3.8% | 2.0% | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher merchandise imports from economies in the arab world, Iceland or Serbia?
- Iceland, at 3.5% against 3.2% in Serbia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in merchandise imports from economies in the arab world between Iceland and Serbia?
- 0.3%, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Iceland and Serbia rank globally for merchandise imports from economies in the arab world?
- Iceland ranks 82nd and Serbia ranks 85th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Merchandise imports from economies in the Arab World (% of total merchandise imports). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Merchandise imports from economies in the Arab World are the sum of merchandise imports by the reporting economy from economies in the Arab World. Data are expressed as a percentage of total merchandise imports by the economy. Data are computed only if at least half of the economies in the partner country group had non-missing data.