Latvia vs New Caledonia: Merchandise imports from economies in the Arab World
Merchandise imports from economies in the Arab World over time
- Latvia
- New Caledonia
How they compare
New Caledonia currently reports 0.2% against 0.2% in Latvia, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.2 times Latvia's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, New Caledonia has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 174th and New Caledonia ranks 171st of 206 countries.
New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.1% | 0.2% | 0.1% | New Caledonia |
| 2000s | 0.1% | 0.3% | 0.2% | New Caledonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher merchandise imports from economies in the arab world, Latvia or New Caledonia?
- New Caledonia, at 0.2% against 0.2% in Latvia as of 2004.
- What is the difference in merchandise imports from economies in the arab world between Latvia and New Caledonia?
- 0.0%, with New Caledonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and New Caledonia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2004.
- How do Latvia and New Caledonia rank globally for merchandise imports from economies in the arab world?
- Latvia ranks 174th and New Caledonia ranks 171st of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Merchandise imports from economies in the Arab World (% of total merchandise imports). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Merchandise imports from economies in the Arab World are the sum of merchandise imports by the reporting economy from economies in the Arab World. Data are expressed as a percentage of total merchandise imports by the economy. Data are computed only if at least half of the economies in the partner country group had non-missing data.