Latvia vs Suriname: Merchandise imports from economies in the Arab World
Merchandise imports from economies in the Arab World over time
- Latvia
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 0.2% against 0.2% in Latvia, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Suriname's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 174th and Suriname ranks 172nd of 206 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Suriname in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.1% | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.1% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0.1% | 0.5% | 0.4% | Suriname |
| 2020s | 0.1% | 0.2% | 0.1% | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher merchandise imports from economies in the arab world, Latvia or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 0.2% against 0.2% in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in merchandise imports from economies in the arab world between Latvia and Suriname?
- 0.0%, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Suriname?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Latvia and Suriname rank globally for merchandise imports from economies in the arab world?
- Latvia ranks 174th and Suriname ranks 172nd of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Merchandise imports from economies in the Arab World (% of total merchandise imports). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Merchandise imports from economies in the Arab World are the sum of merchandise imports by the reporting economy from economies in the Arab World. Data are expressed as a percentage of total merchandise imports by the economy. Data are computed only if at least half of the economies in the partner country group had non-missing data.