Chile vs Tajikistan: Merchandise imports from high-income economies
Merchandise imports from high-income economies over time
- Chile
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Chile currently reports 44.4% against 44.2% in Tajikistan, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Tajikistan ahead.
Chile ranks 154th and Tajikistan ranks 155th of 206 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 3 and Tajikistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 63.9% | 57.1% | 6.8% | Chile |
| 2000s | 48.0% | 39.8% | 8.1% | Chile |
| 2010s | 48.2% | 40.8% | 7.4% | Chile |
| 2020s | 42.5% | 43.5% | 1.1% | Tajikistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher merchandise imports from high-income economies, Chile or Tajikistan?
- Chile, at 44.4% against 44.2% in Tajikistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in merchandise imports from high-income economies between Chile and Tajikistan?
- 0.2%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Tajikistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Chile and Tajikistan rank globally for merchandise imports from high-income economies?
- Chile ranks 154th and Tajikistan ranks 155th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Merchandise imports from high-income economies (% of total merchandise imports). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Merchandise imports from high-income economies are the sum of merchandise imports by the reporting economy from high-income economies according to the World Bank classification of economies. Data are expressed as a percentage of total merchandise imports by the economy. Data are computed only if at least half of the economies in the partner country group had non-missing data.