Eswatini vs Zimbabwe: Merchandise imports from high-income economies
Merchandise imports from high-income economies over time
- Eswatini
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 10.8% against 8.7% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 2.1%.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Eswatini ranks 201st and Zimbabwe ranks 203rd of 206 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9.9% | 18.3% | 8.4% | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 8.3% | 11.4% | 3.0% | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 11.3% | 8.7% | 2.6% | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher merchandise imports from high-income economies, Eswatini or Zimbabwe?
- Eswatini, at 10.8% against 8.7% in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in merchandise imports from high-income economies between Eswatini and Zimbabwe?
- 2.1%, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Zimbabwe?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Zimbabwe rank globally for merchandise imports from high-income economies?
- Eswatini ranks 201st and Zimbabwe ranks 203rd of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Merchandise imports from high-income economies (% of total merchandise imports). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Merchandise imports from high-income economies are the sum of merchandise imports by the reporting economy from high-income economies according to the World Bank classification of economies. Data are expressed as a percentage of total merchandise imports by the economy. Data are computed only if at least half of the economies in the partner country group had non-missing data.