High income vs Latvia: Merchandise imports from high-income economies
Merchandise imports from high-income economies over time
- High income
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 90.7% against 67.4% in High income, a difference of 23.3%.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.3 times High income's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
High income ranks 11th and Latvia ranks 10th of 47 groups.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | High income | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 80.3% | 91.3% | 11.0% | Latvia |
| 2000s | 74.6% | 91.2% | 16.7% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 68.8% | 91.1% | 22.2% | Latvia |
| 2020s | 67.1% | 90.3% | 23.3% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher merchandise imports from high-income economies, High income or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 90.7% against 67.4% in High income as of 2023.
- What is the difference in merchandise imports from high-income economies between High income and Latvia?
- 23.3%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for High income and Latvia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do High income and Latvia rank globally for merchandise imports from high-income economies?
- High income ranks 11th and Latvia ranks 10th of 47 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Merchandise imports from high-income economies (% of total merchandise imports). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Merchandise imports from high-income economies are the sum of merchandise imports by the reporting economy from high-income economies according to the World Bank classification of economies. Data are expressed as a percentage of total merchandise imports by the economy. Data are computed only if at least half of the economies in the partner country group had non-missing data.