Lithuania vs World: Merchandise imports from high-income economies
Merchandise imports from high-income economies over time
- Lithuania
- World
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 90.8% against 65.1% in World, a difference of 25.7%.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.4 times World's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.
Lithuania ranks 9th and World ranks 12th of 206 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | World | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 91.6% | 80.8% | 10.8% | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 91.4% | 74.2% | 17.2% | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 90.2% | 67.3% | 22.9% | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 88.6% | 65.0% | 23.5% | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher merchandise imports from high-income economies, Lithuania or World?
- Lithuania, at 90.8% against 65.1% in World as of 2023.
- What is the difference in merchandise imports from high-income economies between Lithuania and World?
- 25.7%, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and World?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Lithuania and World rank globally for merchandise imports from high-income economies?
- Lithuania ranks 9th and World ranks 12th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Merchandise imports from high-income economies (% of total merchandise imports). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Merchandise imports from high-income economies are the sum of merchandise imports by the reporting economy from high-income economies according to the World Bank classification of economies. Data are expressed as a percentage of total merchandise imports by the economy. Data are computed only if at least half of the economies in the partner country group had non-missing data.