East Timor vs Uganda: Merchandise imports from high-income economies
Merchandise imports from high-income economies over time
- East Timor
- Uganda
How they compare
East Timor currently reports 36.8% against 35.0% in Uganda, a difference of 1.8%.
That makes East Timor's figure about 1.1 times Uganda's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Uganda ahead.
East Timor ranks 177th and Uganda ranks 180th of 206 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | East Timor | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 32.4% | 49.9% | 17.5% | Uganda |
| 2010s | 38.5% | 39.5% | 1.0% | Uganda |
| 2020s | 34.2% | 35.6% | 1.4% | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher merchandise imports from high-income economies, East Timor or Uganda?
- East Timor, at 36.8% against 35.0% in Uganda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in merchandise imports from high-income economies between East Timor and Uganda?
- 1.8%, with East Timor ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for East Timor and Uganda?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2023.
- How do East Timor and Uganda rank globally for merchandise imports from high-income economies?
- East Timor ranks 177th and Uganda ranks 180th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Merchandise imports from high-income economies (% of total merchandise imports). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Merchandise imports from high-income economies are the sum of merchandise imports by the reporting economy from high-income economies according to the World Bank classification of economies. Data are expressed as a percentage of total merchandise imports by the economy. Data are computed only if at least half of the economies in the partner country group had non-missing data.