Guatemala vs Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC): Merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in Latin

Guatemala
29.2%
in 2023
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
7.0%
in 2023
Guatemala rank
8th
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
6th

Merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in Latin over time

  • Guatemala
  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
0102030196019912023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 29.2% against 7.0% in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 22.2%.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 4.2 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.

Across all 64 years both countries report, Guatemala has been ahead every year.

Guatemala ranks 8th and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 6th of 206 countries.

Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Difference Ahead
1960s 16.1% 2.2% 13.8% Guatemala
1970s 23.5% 3.9% 19.6% Guatemala
1980s 23.5% 4.9% 18.7% Guatemala
1990s 23.4% 5.0% 18.3% Guatemala
2000s 26.4% 7.9% 18.5% Guatemala
2010s 28.8% 6.8% 22.0% Guatemala
2020s 28.7% 6.9% 21.8% Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in latin, Guatemala or Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
Guatemala, at 29.2% against 7.0% in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2023.
What is the difference in merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in latin between Guatemala and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
22.2%, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
64 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank globally for merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in latin?
Guatemala ranks 8th and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 6th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in Latin America & the Caribbean (% of total merchandise imports). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC): Merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in Latin. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/merchandise-imports-from-low-and-middle-income-economies-in-latin-america-and-the/guatemala/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/merchandise-imports-from-low-and-middle-income-economies-in-latin-america-and-the/guatemala/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/">Guatemala vs Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC): Merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in Latin</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in Latin America & the Caribbean (% of total merchandise imports)
Unit
% of total merchandise imports
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
253 places, 12,628 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in Latin America and the Caribbean are the sum of merchandise imports by the reporting economy from low- and middle-income economies in the Latin America and the Caribbean region according to the World Bank classification of economies. Data are expressed as a percentage of total merchandise imports by the economy. Data are computed only if at least half of the economies in the partner country group had non-missing data.