Aruba vs Curacao: Merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in South
Merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in South over time
- Aruba
- Curacao
How they compare
Curacao currently reports 1.1% against 1.1% in Aruba, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Aruba ahead.
Aruba ranks 155th and Curacao ranks 152nd of 205 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 1 and Curacao in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Curacao | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.5% | 0.2% | 0.3% | Aruba |
| 2020s | 0.9% | 1.0% | 0.1% | Curacao |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in south, Aruba or Curacao?
- Curacao, at 1.1% against 1.1% in Aruba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in south between Aruba and Curacao?
- 0.0%, with Curacao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Curacao?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2023.
- How do Aruba and Curacao rank globally for merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in south?
- Aruba ranks 155th and Curacao ranks 152nd of 205 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in South Asia (% of total merchandise imports). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in South Asia are the sum of merchandise imports by the reporting economy from low- and middle-income economies in the South Asia region according to the World Bank classification of economies. Data are expressed as a percentage of total merchandise imports by the economy. Data are computed only if at least half of the economies in the partner country group had non-missing data.