Chile vs Equatorial Guinea: Merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in South
Merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in South over time
- Chile
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 2.0% against 2.0% in Chile, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Chile ranks 105th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 103rd of 205 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 3 and Equatorial Guinea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.5% | 0.2% | 0.4% | Chile |
| 2000s | 0.8% | 0.4% | 0.4% | Chile |
| 2010s | 1.3% | 0.8% | 0.5% | Chile |
| 2020s | 1.8% | 2.2% | 0.3% | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in south, Chile or Equatorial Guinea?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 2.0% against 2.0% in Chile as of 2023.
- What is the difference in merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in south between Chile and Equatorial Guinea?
- 0.0%, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Equatorial Guinea?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Chile and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in south?
- Chile ranks 105th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 103rd of 205 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in South Asia (% of total merchandise imports). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in South Asia are the sum of merchandise imports by the reporting economy from low- and middle-income economies in the South Asia region according to the World Bank classification of economies. Data are expressed as a percentage of total merchandise imports by the economy. Data are computed only if at least half of the economies in the partner country group had non-missing data.