Gibraltar vs South Africa: Merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in South
Merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in South over time
- Gibraltar
- South Africa
How they compare
Gibraltar currently reports 8.1% against 7.4% in South Africa, a difference of 0.7%.
That makes Gibraltar's figure about 1.1 times South Africa's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was South Africa ahead.
Gibraltar ranks 28th and South Africa ranks 31st of 205 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Gibraltar averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gibraltar | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.5% | 2.0% | 1.5% | South Africa |
| 2010s | 5.3% | 4.8% | 0.4% | Gibraltar |
| 2020s | 4.7% | 6.7% | 2.0% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in south, Gibraltar or South Africa?
- Gibraltar, at 8.1% against 7.4% in South Africa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in south between Gibraltar and South Africa?
- 0.7%, with Gibraltar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gibraltar and South Africa?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Gibraltar and South Africa rank globally for merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in south?
- Gibraltar ranks 28th and South Africa ranks 31st of 205 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in South Asia (% of total merchandise imports). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in South Asia are the sum of merchandise imports by the reporting economy from low- and middle-income economies in the South Asia region according to the World Bank classification of economies. Data are expressed as a percentage of total merchandise imports by the economy. Data are computed only if at least half of the economies in the partner country group had non-missing data.