Guam vs Nauru: Merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in South
Merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in South over time
- Guam
- Nauru
How they compare
Guam currently reports 0.1% against 0.1% in Nauru, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Nauru ahead.
Guam ranks 199th and Nauru ranks 200th of 205 countries.
Nauru has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guam | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.1% | 0.6% | 0.5% | Nauru |
| 2010s | 0.1% | 1.1% | 1.0% | Nauru |
| 2020s | 0.1% | 0.2% | 0.1% | Nauru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in south, Guam or Nauru?
- Guam, at 0.1% against 0.1% in Nauru as of 2023.
- What is the difference in merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in south between Guam and Nauru?
- 0.0%, with Guam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guam and Nauru?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Guam and Nauru rank globally for merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in south?
- Guam ranks 199th and Nauru ranks 200th of 205 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in South Asia (% of total merchandise imports). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in South Asia are the sum of merchandise imports by the reporting economy from low- and middle-income economies in the South Asia region according to the World Bank classification of economies. Data are expressed as a percentage of total merchandise imports by the economy. Data are computed only if at least half of the economies in the partner country group had non-missing data.