Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Gibraltar: Merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
1.5%
in 2023
Gibraltar
8.3%
in 2023
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
34th
Gibraltar rank
37th

Merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in over time

  • Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
  • Gibraltar
0246810196019912023

How they compare

Gibraltar currently reports 8.3% against 1.5% in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 6.8%.

That makes Gibraltar's figure about 5.5 times Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Gibraltar ahead.

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 34th and Gibraltar ranks 37th of 47 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) averaged higher in 1 and Gibraltar in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) Gibraltar Difference Ahead
2000s 0.7% 0.6% 0.1% Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
2010s 0.6% 0.9% 0.2% Gibraltar
2020s 1.0% 7.3% 6.3% Gibraltar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in, Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) or Gibraltar?
Gibraltar, at 8.3% against 1.5% in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2023.
What is the difference in merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in between Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) and Gibraltar?
6.8%, with Gibraltar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) and Gibraltar?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) and Gibraltar rank globally for merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in?
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 34th and Gibraltar ranks 37th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in Sub-Saharan Africa (% of total merchandise imports). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Gibraltar: Merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 19 September 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/merchandise-imports-from-low-and-middle-income-economies-in-sub-saharan-africa-percent-of/europe-and-central-asia-ida-and-ibrd-countries/gibraltar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/merchandise-imports-from-low-and-middle-income-economies-in-sub-saharan-africa-percent-of/europe-and-central-asia-ida-and-ibrd-countries/gibraltar/">Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Gibraltar: Merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in Sub-Saharan Africa (% of total merchandise imports)
Unit
% of total merchandise imports
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
253 places, 12,763 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in Sub-Saharan Africa are the sum of merchandise imports by the reporting economy from low- and middle-income economies in the Sub-Saharan Africa region according to the World Bank classification of economies. Data are expressed as a percentage of total merchandise imports by the economy. Data are computed only if at least half of the economies in the partner country group had non-missing data.