Africa vs Sao Tome and Principe: Protecting investors, shareholder suits index
Protecting investors, shareholder suits index over time
- Africa
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 6 against 4.94 in Africa, a difference of 1.06.
That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.2 times Africa's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.
Africa ranks 5th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 8th of 6 groups.
Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Africa | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.8 | 6 | 1.2 | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2010s | 4.92 | 6 | 1.08 | Sao Tome and Principe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting investors, shareholder suits index, Africa or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 6 against 4.94 in Africa as of 2012.
- What is the difference in protecting investors, shareholder suits index between Africa and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 1.06, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Africa and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2012.
- How do Africa and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for protecting investors, shareholder suits index?
- Africa ranks 5th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 8th of 6 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank, Doing Business project (http://www.doingbusiness.org/), published as Protecting investors, shareholder suits index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Doing Business measures the strength of minority shareholder protections against directors’ misuse of corporate assets for personal gain. The indicators distinguish 3 dimensions of investor protection: transparency of transactions (extent of disclosure index), liability for self-dealing (extent of director liability index) and shareholders’ ability to sue officers and directors for misconduct (ease of shareholder suits index). The data come from a survey of corporate lawyers and are based on company laws, court rules of evidence and securities regulations. For more information, visit http://www.doingbusiness.org/MethodologySurveys/.