Morocco vs Namibia: Protecting investors, shareholder suits index

Morocco
6
in 2012
Namibia
6
in 2012
Morocco rank
8th
Namibia rank
8th

Protecting investors, shareholder suits index over time

  • Morocco
  • Namibia
123456200520082012

How they compare

Morocco currently reports 6 against 6 in Namibia, a difference of 0.

Across all 8 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.

Morocco ranks 8th and Namibia ranks 8th of 51 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Morocco Namibia Difference Ahead
2000s 1 6 5 Namibia
2010s 4.33 6 1.67 Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher protecting investors, shareholder suits index, Morocco or Namibia?
Morocco, at 6 against 6 in Namibia as of 2012.
What is the difference in protecting investors, shareholder suits index between Morocco and Namibia?
0, with Morocco ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Morocco and Namibia?
8 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2012.
How do Morocco and Namibia rank globally for protecting investors, shareholder suits index?
Morocco ranks 8th and Namibia ranks 8th of 51 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank, Doing Business project (http://www.doingbusiness.org/), published as Protecting investors, shareholder suits index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Protecting investors, shareholder suits index
Source
World Bank, Doing Business project (http://www.doingbusiness.org/)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
57 places, 455 data points, 2005–2012
Last refreshed

Doing Business measures the strength of minority shareholder protections against directors’ misuse of corporate assets for personal gain. The indicators distinguish 3 dimensions of investor protection: transparency of transactions (extent of disclosure index), liability for self-dealing (extent of director liability index) and shareholders’ ability to sue officers and directors for misconduct (ease of shareholder suits index). The data come from a survey of corporate lawyers and are based on company laws, court rules of evidence and securities regulations. For more information, visit http://www.doingbusiness.org/MethodologySurveys/.