Sub-Saharan Africa vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Protecting investors, shareholder suits index
Protecting investors, shareholder suits index over time
- Sub-Saharan Africa
- Tanzania, United Republic of
How they compare
Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 8 against 5.02 in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 2.98.
That makes Tanzania, United Republic of's figure about 1.6 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Tanzania, United Republic of has been ahead every year.
Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 2nd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 4th of 6 groups.
Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sub-Saharan Africa | Tanzania, United Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.97 | 7.6 | 2.63 | Tanzania, United Republic of |
| 2010s | 5.03 | 8 | 2.97 | Tanzania, United Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting investors, shareholder suits index, Sub-Saharan Africa or Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Tanzania, United Republic of, at 8 against 5.02 in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2012.
- What is the difference in protecting investors, shareholder suits index between Sub-Saharan Africa and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 2.98, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sub-Saharan Africa and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2012.
- How do Sub-Saharan Africa and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for protecting investors, shareholder suits index?
- Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 2nd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 4th of 6 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank, Doing Business project (http://www.doingbusiness.org/), published as Protecting investors, shareholder suits index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Doing Business measures the strength of minority shareholder protections against directors’ misuse of corporate assets for personal gain. The indicators distinguish 3 dimensions of investor protection: transparency of transactions (extent of disclosure index), liability for self-dealing (extent of director liability index) and shareholders’ ability to sue officers and directors for misconduct (ease of shareholder suits index). The data come from a survey of corporate lawyers and are based on company laws, court rules of evidence and securities regulations. For more information, visit http://www.doingbusiness.org/MethodologySurveys/.