Antigua and Barbuda vs Mali: Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score
Antigua and Barbuda
28.2%
in 2019
Mali
26.3%
in 2019
Antigua and Barbuda rank
166th
Mali rank
169th
Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Mali
How they compare
Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 28.2% against 26.3% in Mali, a difference of 1.9%.
That makes Antigua and Barbuda's figure about 1.1 times Mali's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Antigua and Barbuda has been ahead every year.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 166th and Mali ranks 169th of 191 countries.
Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 25.3% | 0.0% | 25.3% | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 2010s | 27.8% | 24.6% | 3.2% | Antigua and Barbuda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: cost (% of property value) - score, Antigua and Barbuda or Mali?
- Antigua and Barbuda, at 28.2% against 26.3% in Mali as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: cost (% of property value) - score between Antigua and Barbuda and Mali?
- 1.9%, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Mali?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Mali rank globally for registering property: cost (% of property value) - score?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 166th and Mali ranks 169th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.