Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Hungary: Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score
Bosnia and Herzegovina
65.8%
in 2019
Hungary
66.6%
in 2019
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
101st
Hungary rank
99th
Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Hungary
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 66.6% against 65.8% in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.8%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 101st and Hungary ranks 99th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 1 and Hungary in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Hungary | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 65.0% | 26.6% | 38.4% | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 65.3% | 66.6% | 1.2% | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: cost (% of property value) - score, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Hungary?
- Hungary, at 66.6% against 65.8% in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: cost (% of property value) - score between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Hungary?
- 0.8%, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Hungary?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Hungary rank globally for registering property: cost (% of property value) - score?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 101st and Hungary ranks 99th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.