Bosnia and Herzegovina vs South Korea: Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score
Bosnia and Herzegovina
65.8%
in 2019
South Korea
65.9%
in 2019
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
101st
South Korea rank
100th
Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- South Korea
How they compare
South Korea currently reports 65.9% against 65.8% in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 101st and South Korea ranks 100th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 1 and South Korea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | South Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 65.0% | 64.8% | 0.2% | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 65.3% | 65.8% | 0.5% | South Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: cost (% of property value) - score, Bosnia and Herzegovina or South Korea?
- South Korea, at 65.9% against 65.8% in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: cost (% of property value) - score between Bosnia and Herzegovina and South Korea?
- 0.1%, with South Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and South Korea?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and South Korea rank globally for registering property: cost (% of property value) - score?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 101st and South Korea ranks 100th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.