Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Sri Lanka: Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score
Bosnia and Herzegovina
65.8%
in 2019
Sri Lanka
65.7%
in 2019
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
101st
Sri Lanka rank
103rd
Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 65.8% against 65.7% in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 101st and Sri Lanka ranks 103rd of 191 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 65.0% | 65.7% | 0.8% | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 65.3% | 65.8% | 0.5% | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: cost (% of property value) - score, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Sri Lanka?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 65.8% against 65.7% in Sri Lanka as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: cost (% of property value) - score between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Sri Lanka?
- 0.1%, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Sri Lanka?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Sri Lanka rank globally for registering property: cost (% of property value) - score?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 101st and Sri Lanka ranks 103rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.