Botswana vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score
Botswana
65.8%
in 2019
Tanzania, United Republic of
65.5%
in 2019
Botswana rank
102nd
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
105th
Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score over time
- Botswana
- Tanzania, United Republic of
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 65.8% against 65.5% in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 102nd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 105th of 191 countries.
Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Tanzania, United Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 67.0% | 67.1% | 0.1% | Tanzania, United Republic of |
| 2010s | 66.1% | 68.9% | 2.8% | Tanzania, United Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: cost (% of property value) - score, Botswana or Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Botswana, at 65.8% against 65.5% in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: cost (% of property value) - score between Botswana and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 0.3%, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Botswana and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for registering property: cost (% of property value) - score?
- Botswana ranks 102nd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 105th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.