Brazil vs Iran, Islamic Republic of: Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score
Brazil
76.3%
in 2019
Iran, Islamic Republic of
74.9%
in 2019
Brazil rank
68th
Iran, Islamic Republic of rank
71st
Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score over time
- Brazil
- Iran, Islamic Republic of
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 76.3% against 74.9% in Iran, Islamic Republic of, a difference of 1.4%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 68th and Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 71st of 191 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Iran, Islamic Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 81.4% | 62.8% | 18.6% | Brazil |
| 2010s | 80.4% | 65.3% | 15.0% | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: cost (% of property value) - score, Brazil or Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- Brazil, at 76.3% against 74.9% in Iran, Islamic Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: cost (% of property value) - score between Brazil and Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- 1.4%, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Brazil and Iran, Islamic Republic of rank globally for registering property: cost (% of property value) - score?
- Brazil ranks 68th and Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 71st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.