Brunei Darussalam vs Republic of Moldova: Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score
Brunei Darussalam
95.9%
in 2019
Republic of Moldova
93.3%
in 2019
Brunei Darussalam rank
24th
Republic of Moldova rank
27th
Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score over time
- Brunei Darussalam
- Republic of Moldova
How they compare
Brunei Darussalam currently reports 95.9% against 93.3% in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 2.6%.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Brunei Darussalam has been ahead every year.
Brunei Darussalam ranks 24th and Republic of Moldova ranks 27th of 191 countries.
Brunei Darussalam has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brunei Darussalam | Republic of Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 96.0% | 91.0% | 5.0% | Brunei Darussalam |
| 2010s | 95.5% | 92.1% | 3.5% | Brunei Darussalam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: cost (% of property value) - score, Brunei Darussalam or Republic of Moldova?
- Brunei Darussalam, at 95.9% against 93.3% in Republic of Moldova as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: cost (% of property value) - score between Brunei Darussalam and Republic of Moldova?
- 2.6%, with Brunei Darussalam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei Darussalam and Republic of Moldova?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Brunei Darussalam and Republic of Moldova rank globally for registering property: cost (% of property value) - score?
- Brunei Darussalam ranks 24th and Republic of Moldova ranks 27th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.