Canada vs Iran, Islamic Republic of: Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score
Canada
74.4%
in 2019
Iran, Islamic Republic of
74.9%
in 2019
Canada rank
74th
Iran, Islamic Republic of rank
71st
Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score over time
- Canada
- Iran, Islamic Republic of
How they compare
Iran, Islamic Republic of currently reports 74.9% against 74.4% in Canada, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Canada ahead.
Canada ranks 74th and Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 71st of 191 countries.
Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Iran, Islamic Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 89.8% | 62.8% | 27.0% | Canada |
| 2010s | 80.5% | 65.3% | 15.1% | Canada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: cost (% of property value) - score, Canada or Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- Iran, Islamic Republic of, at 74.9% against 74.4% in Canada as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: cost (% of property value) - score between Canada and Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- 0.5%, with Iran, Islamic Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Canada and Iran, Islamic Republic of rank globally for registering property: cost (% of property value) - score?
- Canada ranks 74th and Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 71st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.