Central African Republic vs Nigeria: Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score
Central African Republic
26.6%
in 2019
Nigeria
24.8%
in 2019
Central African Republic rank
168th
Nigeria rank
170th
Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score over time
- Central African Republic
- Nigeria
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 26.6% against 24.8% in Nigeria, a difference of 1.8%.
That makes Central African Republic's figure about 1.1 times Nigeria's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Nigeria ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 168th and Nigeria ranks 170th of 191 countries.
Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Nigeria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2010s | 23.8% | 13.3% | 10.5% | Central African Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: cost (% of property value) - score, Central African Republic or Nigeria?
- Central African Republic, at 26.6% against 24.8% in Nigeria as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: cost (% of property value) - score between Central African Republic and Nigeria?
- 1.8%, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Nigeria?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Central African Republic and Nigeria rank globally for registering property: cost (% of property value) - score?
- Central African Republic ranks 168th and Nigeria ranks 170th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.