Democratic Republic of Congo vs Luxembourg: Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score
Democratic Republic of Congo
32.5%
in 2019
Luxembourg
32.6%
in 2019
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
163rd
Luxembourg rank
162nd
Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score over time
- Democratic Republic of Congo
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 32.6% against 32.5% in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 163rd and Luxembourg ranks 162nd of 191 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Democratic Republic of Congo | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.0% | 32.3% | 30.2% | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 27.8% | 32.5% | 4.7% | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: cost (% of property value) - score, Democratic Republic of Congo or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 32.6% against 32.5% in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: cost (% of property value) - score between Democratic Republic of Congo and Luxembourg?
- 0.1%, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Luxembourg?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Luxembourg rank globally for registering property: cost (% of property value) - score?
- Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 163rd and Luxembourg ranks 162nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.