Democratic Republic of Congo vs Zambia: Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score
Democratic Republic of Congo
32.5%
in 2019
Zambia
36.5%
in 2019
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
163rd
Zambia rank
161st
Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score over time
- Democratic Republic of Congo
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 36.5% against 32.5% in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 4.0%.
That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Democratic Republic of Congo's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Zambia ahead.
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 163rd and Zambia ranks 161st of 191 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Democratic Republic of Congo | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.4% | 42.6% | 41.2% | Zambia |
| 2010s | 27.8% | 33.9% | 6.0% | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: cost (% of property value) - score, Democratic Republic of Congo or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 36.5% against 32.5% in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: cost (% of property value) - score between Democratic Republic of Congo and Zambia?
- 4.0%, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Zambia?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Zambia rank globally for registering property: cost (% of property value) - score?
- Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 163rd and Zambia ranks 161st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.