Croatia vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score
Croatia
80.0%
in 2019
Lao People's Democratic Republic
79.3%
in 2019
Croatia rank
57th
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
60th
Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score over time
- Croatia
- Lao People's Democratic Republic
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 80.0% against 79.3% in Lao People's Democratic Republic, a difference of 0.7%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Lao People's Democratic Republic ahead.
Croatia ranks 57th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 60th of 191 countries.
Lao People's Democratic Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Lao People's Democratic Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 66.6% | 70.3% | 3.8% | Lao People's Democratic Republic |
| 2010s | 69.3% | 69.7% | 0.4% | Lao People's Democratic Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: cost (% of property value) - score, Croatia or Lao People's Democratic Republic?
- Croatia, at 80.0% against 79.3% in Lao People's Democratic Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: cost (% of property value) - score between Croatia and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
- 0.7%, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Croatia and Lao People's Democratic Republic rank globally for registering property: cost (% of property value) - score?
- Croatia ranks 57th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 60th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.