Dominican Republic vs North Macedonia: Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score
Dominican Republic
77.6%
in 2019
North Macedonia
78.6%
in 2019
Dominican Republic rank
64th
North Macedonia rank
63rd
Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score over time
- Dominican Republic
- North Macedonia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 78.6% against 77.6% in Dominican Republic, a difference of 1.0%.
Across all 16 years both countries report, North Macedonia has been ahead every year.
Dominican Republic ranks 64th and North Macedonia ranks 63rd of 191 countries.
North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 67.6% | 76.7% | 9.2% | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 75.8% | 78.4% | 2.6% | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: cost (% of property value) - score, Dominican Republic or North Macedonia?
- North Macedonia, at 78.6% against 77.6% in Dominican Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: cost (% of property value) - score between Dominican Republic and North Macedonia?
- 1.0%, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and North Macedonia?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Dominican Republic and North Macedonia rank globally for registering property: cost (% of property value) - score?
- Dominican Republic ranks 64th and North Macedonia ranks 63rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.