Equatorial Guinea vs Liberia: Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score
Equatorial Guinea
16.7%
in 2019
Liberia
11.4%
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea rank
175th
Liberia rank
178th
Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Liberia
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 16.7% against 11.4% in Liberia, a difference of 5.3%.
That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.5 times Liberia's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 175th and Liberia ranks 178th of 191 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Liberia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.7% | 11.1% | 5.5% | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 16.7% | 9.3% | 7.3% | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: cost (% of property value) - score, Equatorial Guinea or Liberia?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 16.7% against 11.4% in Liberia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: cost (% of property value) - score between Equatorial Guinea and Liberia?
- 5.3%, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Liberia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Liberia rank globally for registering property: cost (% of property value) - score?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 175th and Liberia ranks 178th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.