Hungary vs Republic of Korea: Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score
Hungary
66.6%
in 2019
Republic of Korea
65.9%
in 2019
Hungary rank
99th
Republic of Korea rank
100th
Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score over time
- Hungary
- Republic of Korea
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 66.6% against 65.9% in Republic of Korea, a difference of 0.7%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Republic of Korea ahead.
Hungary ranks 99th and Republic of Korea ranks 100th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Hungary averaged higher in 1 and Republic of Korea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Republic of Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26.6% | 64.8% | 38.2% | Republic of Korea |
| 2010s | 66.6% | 65.8% | 0.7% | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: cost (% of property value) - score, Hungary or Republic of Korea?
- Hungary, at 66.6% against 65.9% in Republic of Korea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: cost (% of property value) - score between Hungary and Republic of Korea?
- 0.7%, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Republic of Korea?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Hungary and Republic of Korea rank globally for registering property: cost (% of property value) - score?
- Hungary ranks 99th and Republic of Korea ranks 100th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.