Iran, Islamic Republic of vs Samoa: Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score
Iran, Islamic Republic of
74.9%
in 2019
Samoa
74.7%
in 2019
Iran, Islamic Republic of rank
71st
Samoa rank
72nd
Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score over time
- Iran, Islamic Republic of
- Samoa
How they compare
Iran, Islamic Republic of currently reports 74.9% against 74.7% in Samoa, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Samoa ahead.
Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 71st and Samoa ranks 72nd of 191 countries.
Samoa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iran, Islamic Republic of | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 62.8% | 88.1% | 25.3% | Samoa |
| 2010s | 65.3% | 79.2% | 13.8% | Samoa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: cost (% of property value) - score, Iran, Islamic Republic of or Samoa?
- Iran, Islamic Republic of, at 74.9% against 74.7% in Samoa as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: cost (% of property value) - score between Iran, Islamic Republic of and Samoa?
- 0.2%, with Iran, Islamic Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iran, Islamic Republic of and Samoa?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Iran, Islamic Republic of and Samoa rank globally for registering property: cost (% of property value) - score?
- Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 71st and Samoa ranks 72nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.