Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) vs Switzerland: Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
98.2%
in 2019
Switzerland
98.3%
in 2019
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank
16th
Switzerland rank
15th
Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score over time
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
- Switzerland
How they compare
Switzerland currently reports 98.3% against 98.2% in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Switzerland ahead.
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 16th and Switzerland ranks 15th of 191 countries.
Switzerland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 96.1% | 98.3% | 2.2% | Switzerland |
| 2010s | 97.6% | 98.3% | 0.8% | Switzerland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: cost (% of property value) - score, Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) or Switzerland?
- Switzerland, at 98.3% against 98.2% in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: cost (% of property value) - score between Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Switzerland?
- 0.1%, with Switzerland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Switzerland?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Switzerland rank globally for registering property: cost (% of property value) - score?
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 16th and Switzerland ranks 15th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.