Kyrgyzstan vs Russian Federation: Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score
Kyrgyzstan
99.0%
in 2019
Russian Federation
99.1%
in 2019
Kyrgyzstan rank
11th
Russian Federation rank
10th
Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 99.1% against 99.0% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.1%.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Russian Federation has been ahead every year.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 11th and Russian Federation ranks 10th of 191 countries.
Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 68.0% | 97.9% | 29.9% | Russian Federation |
| 2010s | 95.8% | 98.9% | 3.1% | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: cost (% of property value) - score, Kyrgyzstan or Russian Federation?
- Russian Federation, at 99.1% against 99.0% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: cost (% of property value) - score between Kyrgyzstan and Russian Federation?
- 0.1%, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Russian Federation?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Russian Federation rank globally for registering property: cost (% of property value) - score?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 11th and Russian Federation ranks 10th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.