Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Türkiye: Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score
Lao People's Democratic Republic
79.3%
in 2019
Türkiye
79.9%
in 2019
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
60th
Türkiye rank
58th
Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score over time
- Lao People's Democratic Republic
- Türkiye
How they compare
Türkiye currently reports 79.9% against 79.3% in Lao People's Democratic Republic, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Türkiye ahead.
Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 60th and Türkiye ranks 58th of 191 countries.
Türkiye has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lao People's Democratic Republic | Türkiye | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70.3% | 79.7% | 9.4% | Türkiye |
| 2010s | 69.7% | 76.1% | 6.5% | Türkiye |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: cost (% of property value) - score, Lao People's Democratic Republic or Türkiye?
- Türkiye, at 79.9% against 79.3% in Lao People's Democratic Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: cost (% of property value) - score between Lao People's Democratic Republic and Türkiye?
- 0.6%, with Türkiye ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lao People's Democratic Republic and Türkiye?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Lao People's Democratic Republic and Türkiye rank globally for registering property: cost (% of property value) - score?
- Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 60th and Türkiye ranks 58th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.